The Truth about Breeding and Showing Rabbits

Bucky's Bunny Barn
 
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Valley/1155/

 Reprinted with permission Corrine Fayo

The internet is a great place to find information, however there is a negative side. This side is filled with people who have mis-information, rumors, and half truths which are bandied about as fact. It is hard to try and sort out who is right and who is wrong, or often who has information based on fact but has distorted it to the point it doesn't resemble the truth anymore. As a service to pet owners and the general public who often times have no knowledge of rabbit breeding and showing I wish to dispel some of the more common 'net rumors. Since there are so many, and many equally important the article doesn't present them in order of importance.

I feel a need to do this to try and stop the growing gap between breeders and pet owners. Years ago this was not there, breeders and pet owners worked together sharing information and stories about our favorite animal, rabbits. The rabbit binds all of us together and I wish to share that bond with everyone, whether you're a breeder or a pet owner. The ugly nasty rumors circulating the internet are meant to turn us against each other, but we need each other. Pet owners have as much important information to share with a breeder as a breeder has to share with a pet owner.

The first rumor I wish to discuss is the "Greedy Breeder" rumor. Those against breeding often suggest a breeders goal in raising rabbits is to profit. I'm sure many examples of TAB's (those against breeding) statements will pop into your mind. Well the truth be told, there isn't any money in rabbit breeding, nada, zip, nothing! There is however plenty of expenses. Even commercial breeders will tell you they make a very small profit in which to live on but there is no pot of gold at the end of this rainbow. Certainly a breeder who pursues it as a hobby can only dream of "breaking even" with all the expenses that go into maintaining a quality show herd. People raise rabbits for many reasons, money is not even on the list.

The next rumor deals with alleged "rabbit overpopulation" and rabbit breeders being the cause. There is a problem with people buying rabbits on impulse and dumping them when their care or behavior becomes too much to handle. Everyone including breeders wish that this never happened, however to say there is a severe overpopulation crisis is not correct. I have contacted several groups, PETA, HSUS, ASPCA, HRS, as well as shelters, and none of these organizations have any figures for the number of rabbits abandoned. I have continually asked for proof that an overpopulation crisis exists but have yet to be offered any. The best the TABs have produced is the "I said there was one so that makes it true" statements.

Last year a survey was done to try and determine the extent of the problem, the result was an estimate of 43,000 rabbits abandoned nationwide in shelters in 1996. In addition, in an article Merrit Clifton is quoted as saying in 1996 a total of 5.1 million animals were euthanized in shelters nationwide, 1.5 million dogs, 3.5 million cats, and 100,000 others (raccoons, skunks, ferrets, gerbils). So it is not possible that more than 100,000 rabbits could have been euthanized in 1996, and these figures would also suggest the survey results are valid. Apparently one rabbit rescue groups is stating that over 1 million rabbits are euthanized yearly, another rumor. I did check with this group and they now say they never said that.

The Pet Products Manufacturing Association estimated that as of 1996 there were 4 million pet rabbits. So to begin with the TABs have no accurate figures to determine or support the statement that there is an "overpopulation crisis". Overpopulation is used by animal rights activists to push for restrictive breeding ordinances. According to Clifton the peak of euthanasia occurred in 1987 with 17.8 million animals killed in shelters and since that time the number has gone down quite dramatically. If you check with the larger animal rights groups they are giving much higher figures, afterall a decreasing rate of abandoned animals is not a good argument to use to restrict breeding.

And coupled with the "overpopulation" claims we have the claim that breeders are responsible for it. All I can say is how is this possible? Are breeders forcing pet owners at gun point to dump their animals? Of course not! The true cause of abandonment is the irresponsible pet owner. This person is often the impulse buyer who does not bother to alter their animal and in turn ends up with babies that are then dumped. These people don't care about learning about the proper care or buying from a reputable, responsible breeder, all they want is the animal and they want it now. In order to further decrease abandonment and euthanasia we must confront the true cause and not harass those not responsible for it.

Another bit of misinformation is that culling begins with a k-i. The definition of this breeding term as per the ARBA Guidebook reads: " Removal of undesirable rabbits from the herd". Each breeder decides what his goals are when breeding rabbits. Those that do not fit into this goal are "undesirable" and not used in the breeding program. Keep in mind this is not saying a rabbit is bad, or wouldn't be a good companion, etc. Culling simply means choosing which rabbits to make a part of your herd. And again what a breeder looks for or wants will vary.

For example I raise show rabbits and will cull rabbits for show disqualification's or those not matching up to the standard. A cull could also be a rabbit that is show quality or breeding quality but either not as good as another rabbit in my herd or not what I want to breed. I strive to breed for temperament as well as to the standard and so far I have not had problems with mean rabbits. Oh except for those "teenage" bunny years, but even then I only have to contend with growling, grunting, and being unsociable. My culls are sold as pets. Just because a breeder culls it does not automatically mean the rabbit goes to a "commercial" purpose. But the bottom line in my mind is that all breeders must be responsible in whichever manner they choose to remove culled rabbits. And the vast majority are thankfully!

Which brings us to another rumor, that breeders breed without regard to health, temperament, or genetic problems. This couldn't be farther from the truth! It also is very upsetting to all us responsible breeders who have spent time learning genetics, disease, and a host of other subjects so we are only breeding the best quality rabbits. I never read anything in ARBA literature or articles from breeders that suggest we should be breeding any old rabbit.

On the contrary, the recommendations are to only breed the healthiest rabbits and select those that are resistant to disease, those that do not have genetic problems in their line such as malocclusion, those that have good temperament never a mean rabbit, and those that are the best.

I can't count the number of times I've heard a breeder recommend that if a genetic problem shows up in a line to stop breeding that line and go back to re-evaluate what and where things went wrong. Or that one should not breed aggressive animals because you will end up with offspring who are nasty. Or even that rabbits who have had a problem such has snuffles or wry neck should not be bred. The unfortunate pet owners with unhealthy rabbits can probably trace it back to an irresponsible pet owners accidental litter. A responsible and reputable breeder is doing it to improve the breed, not destroy it.

And finally I'd like to cover the rumors about breeders not caring properly for their rabbits. These rumors cover a wide range of subjects, no toys or exercise time, caged outdoors, forced to endure being shown, not educating pet owners, treated as livestock, etc. All this is not true. The very vast majority of breeders often place their rabbits even before their family members so rumors that we neglect or mistreat our animals are hurtful and so untrue. Breeders do provide toys for their rabbits. And yes they even allow them out to play.

Many of you may think the term "house rabbit" was invented in the late 80's. but it wasn't. Long before then breeders were recommending people provide toys and bring bunny inside to play with. The breeders were the ones who invented the term "rabbit proofing". And there isn't anything wrong with keeping a rabbit outdoors, or in a shed or barn, or even the basement! Wherever you house your bunny there are pros and cons to deal with, one shouldn't be too quick to judge another.

The important thing is, are the rabbits safe, happy, and healthy. I know breeders who keep rabbits in a shed, complete with A/C and heat in winter, and some have them inside basements or garages and are careful they get plenty of light and fresh air. Those that keep them outside often report their rabbits are healthier because they get plenty of fresh air. And of course there are breeders who have house rabbits. There is no one perfect place for housing that we can or should measure all of us by.

I'm also happy to report that in discussions across the country with other breeders most do provide written instructions for pet owners. Many have written me for a copy of their carebook to make sure they are providing enough and accurate information. And countless breeders do offer a take back policy to ensure none of their rabbits are dumped in shelters or the woods. I have talked to shelter workers and it was communicated to me that the shelter problem is made up of accidental litters from irresponsible pet owners and impulse buys from pet stores. And that us responsible breeders account for almost zero percent!

I hope I've cleared up some of those pesky net rumors about breeders. I may add more in the future, I hope there isn't a need though. Although there are irresponsible and disreputable breeders out there the majority are responsible. It of course upsets us when TABs use the term breeder to mean anyone who puts two rabbits together and produces a litter and then goes on discussing all the irresponsible and neglectful things this "breeder" does. True rabbit breeders or fanciers strive to provide the best care possible for our rabbits.

We work hard at being responsible and reputable and to give back to the rabbit industry. There is alot of heartaches and disappointment that goes along with being a responsible breeder that pet owners may not even be aware of. We spend the night nursing sick rabbits, both our own and others, we have to make tough decisions when an animal becomes sick or disabled. And often cry when one of our beloved pets passes on. Oh yes, we do think of our rabbits as our pets. There really isn't a difference between a breeder or a pet owner, let's work to keep that special bond!

Some suggestions:
If you also believe breeders and pet owners should work together you can help out in many ways. Don't buy from an irresponsible breeder, make sure they provide care information, have healthy rabbits, and if they offer any guarantees. If you know someone who wants to buy a rabbit tell them to visit a responsible breeder, rather than a petstore.

If you see someone bashing breeders or ARBA tell them to stop because it isn't fair to lump all breeders into one catch all group. And if you belong to groups or organizations who are against even responsible breeding and showing let them know that position isn't something you support. Better yet quit the group or organization and tell them why!